case law for vcsst - An Overview
case law for vcsst - An Overview
Blog Article
Google Scholar – an unlimited database of state and federal case law, which is searchable by keyword, phrase, or citations. Google Scholar also allows searchers to specify which level of court cases to search, from federal, to specific states.
Article 199 on the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other ample remedy is provided by regulation." It's very well-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust accessible remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether These remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. five/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION:2025 SHC KHI 46 SHC Citation: SHC-252218 Tag:I have read the discovered counsel for the parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments given that the issues with the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard on the interim relief application in terms of Section 7(1) of your Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 at hand over possession on the subjected premises to the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to generally be decided through the competent court after hearing the parties if pending because the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer within the Illegal Dispossession case and as far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court should see this aspect for interim custody of the topic premises In the event the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two months from the date of receipt of this order.
Persuasive Authority – Prior court rulings that could possibly be consulted in deciding a current case. It may be used to guide the court, but is not binding precedent.
thirteen . Const. P. 209/2025 (S.B.) Saifullah Jamali (Disable) V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi After arguing the matter at some length, both parties have agreed to your disposal of the instant petition over the premise that the DIGP Malir will listen to the petitioner in addition to private respondents and will choose care of every one of the aspects of the case and guarantee that no harassment shall be caused to both the parties.
However it is made very clear that police is free to acquire action against any person that's indulged in criminal activities subject to legislation. However no harassment shall be caused to your petitioner, if she acts within the bonds of regulation. Police shall also ensure respect from the family shed in accordance with law and whenever they have reasonable ground to prevent the congnizable offence they will act, as far as raiding the house is concerned the police shall secure concrete evidence and obtain necessary permission from the concerned high police official/Magistrate being a issue of security with the house is concerned, which is just not public place under the Act 1977. nine. Contemplating the aforementioned details, the objective of filing this petition is attained. As a result, this petition is hereby disposed of while in the terms stated earlier mentioned. Read more
27 . Const. P. 4002/2011 (D.B.) Ibrahim Noor V/S Pakistan International Airlines Corporation & Ors. Sindh High Court, Karachi Even, if a petitioner was acquitted in the criminal case following a conviction, in NAB Reference No. twenty/2011, this does not automatically result in exoneration from departmental charges based within the same factual grounds. When a writ under Article 199 is available in specific limited situations, it truly is generally not the right remedy to contest a dismissal from service based on these charges, particularly when the employee was afforded a full possibility to cross-analyze witnesses and present his/her defense but didn't encourage the department of his/her innocence.
Because of this, only citing the case is more prone to annoy a judge than help the party’s case. Consider it as calling someone to inform them you’ve found their misplaced phone, then telling them you live in these types of-and-these neighborhood, without actually supplying them an address. Driving throughout the community seeking to find their phone is likely to generally be more frustrating than it’s value.
The DCFS social worker in charge of your boy’s case experienced the boy made a ward of DCFS, and in her six-thirty day period report towards the court, the worker elaborated on the boy’s sexual abuse history, case law on mutation and stated that she planned to maneuver him from a facility into a “more homelike setting.” The court approved her plan.
Article 27 of your Constitution does not only safeguard against discrimination on the time of appointment of service but after the appointment likewise. The disparity while in the pay back scale allowances of Stenographers inside the District Judiciary is while in the crystal clear negation on the regulation laid down by the Supreme Court in its numerous pronouncements. Read more
The police have the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a Court for cognizable offenses. The presence of this power casts an obligation around the police, they usually must bear in mind, as held by this Court from time to time in its various pronouncemnts, that if a person is arrested to get a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. Primarily, the Police Officers are needed to protect and not abduct. Read more
If granted absolute immunity, the parties would not only be protected from liability in the matter, but couldn't be answerable in any way for their actions. When the court delayed making such a ruling, the defendants took their request for the appellate court.
Where there are several members of a court deciding a case, there could possibly be a person or more judgments specified (or reported). Only the reason for the decision in the majority can constitute a binding precedent, but all could possibly be cited as persuasive, or their reasoning can be adopted within an argument.
Free database for searching federal court dockets and documents pulled from PACER. Coverage is not extensive, but this is a superb starting point. See Background section at base of RECAP website for more information.